LINUX distro vs LINUX distro, No XP

Well, i see there is no linux section here, so i starterd one, but this section only discuss about linux distro, so dont wonder there is a microsoft product here.

At first i would like to discuss about Damn Small Linux a.k.a DSL Linux, the OS have only 50mb sistem files to boot a computer, well it done well on a ¨BC¨ computers, but its really DAMN small, theres nothing in there, all are so complicated, the distro is the the 6th rank in [Only registered and activated users can see links] all that make it become the 6th is only the name.... DSL...

Lets see the Puppy Linux [Only registered and activated users can see links] , 70mb at size, only a bit difference size, boot up a computer without harddisk or cdrom, and run very well..... it have all in one wizard to lan, sound, graphic etc... have preinstalled office suit, internet browser, mp3, vcd, dvd player, image viewer, networking server, and much more you can imagine...

So, dont you DSL be proud of your 50mb size... you are NOTHING.....
Just a really DAMN small linux...

Hm, i dont see a sense in what u wrote, Of course theres "nothing in there", but this is exactly what DSL is good for.