I am greatly disturbed by the trend that employers are now following: that of using 'pop' psychological profiling to discriminate between candidates.
I vehemently disagree that my abilities; my true character; my personality if you will can be augered by 20 tick-questions about how I may react in hypothetical situations.
I am of the firm opinion that they are totally useless in helping to define my or anyone's fitness for a role - whether that role be one of limited responsibility or not.
Anyone agree or disagree?



Reply With Quote